For this first TOW, I
decided I wanted to read something the truly interests me. For me, the two most interesting things in
life are sports and food. So I began the
hunt to find a great article about either sports or food. I ended up deciding on an article called A Blurry Line Between Bar and Restaurant by
Pete Wells, which was written for the New
York Times. Wells has been the
restaurant critic for the New York Times
since 2011, and has received five James Beard Foundation Journalism Awards for
his work. This article was about the recent
trend in the food industry of bars serving high quality restaurant food yet
retaining the bar atmosphere. Wells
wrote this piece as part informative reporting and part argument. His first and foremost goal was to inform the
general public (specifically those in middle to high income households who can
afford going out to eat on a regular basis) about this interesting trend. He also argues for the validity of this
bar-restaurant hybrid. Wells believes
that this new trend combines the great food of a restaurant with the great
atmosphere of a bar. He plugs for this
type of bar, mentioning many specific bars and describing their food in great
detail. This detailed description is one
of the many rhetoric devices that Wells uses.
For instance, he writes, “There may be tiny, tender and nearly gamy
chops; or pork loin wrapped in a purplish and very flavorful pancetta made on
site; or an odd-looking but tender cut of dry-aged steak. A cook tosses the meat on a plancha as the
air fills with the aroma of sizzling fat” (Wells 2). This description helps his purpose because he
makes this bar food sound so utterly delectable that the reader finds
him/herself dying to attend one of these bars.
After reading this article, I learned much about these kinds of bars, and
also wanted to try one. Wells rhetoric
and success in describing the bar food allowed his article to accomplish the
purpose he desired.
No comments:
Post a Comment