IRB Intro Post #3

For my third IRB, I have chosen to read the book Hockeytown Doc: a Half-Century of Red Wings Stories from Howe to Yzerman by Dr. John Finley.  I was introduced to this book by my dad.  He was at a medical conference in Colorado and befriended a doctor from Michigan.  This doctor's father was the team doctor for the Detroit Red Wings for ~50 years.  He wrote this book chronicling the stories from his exciting job.  I think this will be a very fun book to read since I am a huge hockey fan myself.

TOW #16 - How Soccer Explains the World (second half)

I have just finished the book How Soccer Explains the World: an Unlikely Theory of Globalization by Franklin Foer.

When I picked out this novel, I was expecting something eccentric and unbelievable.  I expected that Foer would explain all the theories of globalization by using an extended metaphor of soccer.  For instance, maybe the 4-4-2 formation represents how China’s nation building creates a threat to the Unites States of America, or maybe the rivalry between Real Madrid and Barcelona represent the civil wars raging in Africa.  Unfortunately, this is not the novel I received.  Instead I read a book about globalization with a couple references to soccer in the places of interest.  I felt, during my reading, that this was a recount of what and how globalization happened with some references to soccer.  I think the biggest failure by Foer was his failing to connect the ideas of soccer and the ideas of globalization.  I feel as though Foer wrote two separate books: one on the history of some soccer clubs, and another on the theory of globalization. 

Don’t get me wrong, the writing in the book was very good.  Foer has a nice style of writing that made for an entertaining book.  If you want to learn about globalization, this book is a very good one to read.  My biggest complaint may have been a self-inflicted one: my expectations were far different from the result.  Regardless, Foer used an interesting and advanced diction to truly get his point across.  For instance, he writes, “No longer do these moguls really have to compete with state-owned television networks, r fight for market share against state companies, which have been enfeebled by privatization and deregulation” (Foer 172).  The big words such as enfeebled and deregulation clearly make his point without any confusion.  While it may scare off inexperienced readers, most educated people can understand his writing without any trouble.

TOW #15 - Bruce Arians' aggressive approach pays off; take note, Packers

Last night, Saturday, January 16^th, 2016, one of the most memorable and incredible football games of all time took place.  The Green Bay Packers traveled to Arizona to take on the Cardinals in the NFC Divisional playoff round with a berth in the NFC Championship on the line.  After a long first three quarters, two hail maries in the last minute, an coin flip that didn’t flip, and a 75 yard pass on the first pay of overtime, the Cardinals walked away victorious.  In his article commenting on the coaching styles of the two teams, Bill Barnwell uses anaphora and statistics to make a very compelling argument for aggressive coaching.

            Barnwell employs anaphora during his article in order to accentuate the amount of aggressive play calling and personnel moves that the Cardinals organization has made.  The Cards, he says, “are where they are, in part, because they have a pair of brash leaders (including general manager Steve Keim) who take risks. Who trade for Palmer when his value is lowest and draft Tyrann Mathieu. Who throw downfield and blitz more than anybody else in football. Who attack first and trust their ability to succeed. That seems noble, not naïve.”  This repeated use of “who (verb)” shows that the Cardinals have a pattern of making choices with a high risk and high reward.  The implied argument is that it works.  One need only look at the Cardinals record this season or how they beat the Packers last night.

            In addition to anaphora, Barnwell incorporates lots of statistics to prove his point.  He considers his audience, sports fan, and recognizes that many of them understand the value of statistics and would be more persuaded by statistics than a pathos-based approach.  He uses statistics of all kinds, including, “They blitz more frequently than any other team in football: 46.3 percent of opposing pass plays, since the start of the 2013 season. The average team blitzed on 31 percent of pass attempts over that same timeframe.”  These stats cement Barnwell’s argument in a logical, number-filled world.

TOW #14 - Neighbors

It seems almost a little bit silly, doesn’t it?  A TV service provider is airing commercials on TV about their TV service.  That’s like advertising a Toyota Corolla in the cabin of a Honda Civic.  However odd the concept of this commercial may seem, Direct TV delivers a fantastic visual text that is extremely effective.  In Direct TV’s new advertisement “Neighbors”, the writers utilize a play on words and common references to the westward expansion of America in order to evoke laughter in the audience and thus make their audience more inclined to purchase their service.

Most of all, this commercial is funny.  The word play truly made me chuckle the first time I saw this advertisement and every other time I’ve seen it since then.  The premise of this advertisement is that there is an old time settler/pioneer family living in a modern suburban neighborhood.  The settler family “settles” for cable while the modern neighbors all have Direct TV.  The father is in is front yard plowing the dirt when his son comes out and asks his superior “why can’t we have Direct TV?”  His father replies along the lines of “Son, we are settlers, so that means we settle for cable.”  This word play of “settler” to “someone who settles” is quite clever and one that I had never thought of before.  It’s ingenuity and cunning structure made me laugh.  By making me laugh, Direct TV achieves its goal because I now buy in to what Direct TV is saying.  I am on their side, and now much more inclined to listen to what they are saying with seriousness.

This commercial also utilizes common references to the settlers’ well-known (and stereotyped) way of life.  Including quotes such as “Hey Jebidiah, how’s it going” “working the land, hoping for a fertile spring” makes the audience laugh while watching the commercial.  These obviously exaggerated and stereotypical remarks are funny but remain civilized and not offensive or rude.  They merely serve the purpose of making the audience laugh to get them much more eager to listen to Direct TV’s service proposals, which they end the advertisement with.

TOW #13 - Ice Cream's Identity Crisis

There’s not much better than sitting in front of the TV, spooning some ice cream into your mouth, and not having a care in the world.  But wait.  Is that really ice cream you’re eating?  In his article “Ice Cream’s Identity Crisis”, Dan Barry explores how Breyer’s, one of the most trusted ice cream brands for years, has started turning “ice cream” into “frozen dairy dessert.”  Barry utilizes the rhetorical devices of humor and expert authority in order to show the audience what has changed in food production in America.

            In this unconcerned piece, Barry makes jokes and uses a sarcastic tone throughout his essay to maintain the lightheartedness of the article.  This is about a trivial subject and there is no greater deeper meaning to this piece.  Barry simply wants to give his readers a laugh and maybe make them think twice about what they consume every day.  Barry, in a somewhat exaggerated sense of outrage, writes, “Remember the old schoolyard song?

I scream,

You scream,

We all scream for frozen dairy dessert ...” (Barry 2).

Inserting this clever little joke makes the reader chuckle to themselves, then presents a more serious (although still by no means grave) concern: the changes made to the food industry simply for profit.  Is Barry arguing that Breyer’s needs to change their policies?  That the FDA must enforce stricter regulations?  That we should stop eating frozen dairy product all together?  No, of course not.  He is simply making an observation that the reader can take with a grain of salt; Barry won’t be upset or disrespected if the readers continue to indulge in this fake ice cream product.

            Barry also employs an expert authority to give his argument some credibility.  He says himself he is no food expert, so he enlists the help of one in order to prove that he has a valid point.  Barry quotes a spokeswoman from the FDA to demonstrate that there are small, yet substantial, differences between “ice cream” and “frozen dairy dessert.”  But, as I have described earlier, Barry isn’t making a super passionate plea or argument; he is simply writing a fun article.  With that said, any argument, even one made in jest, requires evidence to be read as intellectual literature, and Barry provides that here with expert authority.

*This is the thrid installment of my project of exploring Dan Barry’s writing.  Barry is, of course, a reliable source.  He is columnist for the New York Times and he writes about sports (among other things) and how they affect our lives.

TOW 12 - How Soccer Explains the World (first half)

I have just completed the first half of my second IRB How Soccer Explains the World.  In this book, Franklin Foer attempts to chronicle the theory of globalization by using the extended metaphor of soccer.  It seems like a very interesting book and, since I love soccer, I think it would be a really cool juxtaposition between the seemingly trivial sport of soccer with the large idea of globalization. 

The writing by Foer in this book is fantastic.  He uses mostly a narrative style of writing, and it is simply splendid.  He uses quotes very effectively and brings in lots of different ideas and evidence to support his argument.  I’ll give you an example of a passage:

“Starting in the 1980s, the soccer hooligan widely came to be considered a leading enemy of the West.  ‘A disgrace to civilized society,’ Margaret Thatcher once said.  Based on a death toll- more than one hundred in the 1980s- the English were the world’s leading producer of deranged fans, but they were far from alone.  Throughout Europe, Latin America, and Africa, violence had become part of soccer’s culture.  And even in places where violence had long accompanied soccer, it became more widespread and destructive in the eighties and nineties.  The Serbian fans were merely a bit better organized and much better armed than the rest of the world” (Foer 13).

As you can see from this passage, Foer is an enthralling writer that captures an audience.  Although this may stem from my interest in his topic, I really enjoy his writing.  I think his use of specifics (of course he gets into a lot more detail in the following chapter than just the excerpt I presented) combined with quotes create a great read.  Foer travelled to most of the places he writes about, and he recorded most of the conversations he had there.  He then puts in direct quotes from villains, officials, and some players which add greatly to the storyline of the book.  These give his characters life, something nonfiction books often fail to accomplish.

My only negative comment about this book is that the relationship between soccer and globalization seems a bit stretched at some points.  It feels a little bit like Foer is using this just as a gimmick and the relationship is not as evident as it seems.  When I look closer at the text, I realize there are some logical fallacies and I don’t quite see how soccer mirrors globalization- it seems to me that soccer is a benefactor of globalization.  Hopefully in the second half of the book Foer ties up these loose ends. 

TOW #11 - Onion Explains: International Drug Trade

For my TOW this week, I analyzed a visual text authored by The Onion in the form of a video.  This video dealt with explaining how international drug trade works.

The international drug trade is one of the most complex and layered problems facing America today.  Respected news agency The Onion recently released a video explaining the multifaceted issue to a wide audience.  Of course, The Onion is a satirical magazine that satirized the stereotypes of the international drug trade and the politicians who propose often-ridiculous ideas on how to limit this behavior.  Through the use of allusions to pop culture, and a serious tone in a professional manner, The Onion effectively satirizes this current event.

In the opening few seconds, the authors put up a picture eerily similar to the scenes of TV’s smash hit Breaking Bad in order to create a relatable form of satire for the large audience.  If The Onion used very advanced, wonky satire, no matter how clever or funny it may be, the audience will not understand and thus will be rendered ineffective.  The authors must use clever and creative ways to make fun of this issue, but it also must be somewhat ubiquitous so that at least most of their audience will understand the jokes presented.  By satirizing the stereotypes about the drug trade, many of which come from America’s obsessive viewing of Breaking Bad, from the platform of a television show, The Onion creates an effective and powerful satire that the entire audience can appreciate.

Throughout the 3 minute long clip, the narrator uses a professional-sounding tone and the images to go along with it are realistic and serious-looking.  By making the appearance as such, The Onion avoids making their satirical piece seem petty, silly, or goofy.  Yes, they are producing a fake story in order to elicit laughs, but they also understand that this is a serious issue and there is some merit to the message behind the video.  The video at one point states something along the lines of “in order to combat the drug trade, the US government should simply let American’s know of all of the household products that can get them just as high as commercial drugs.”  This satirizes some politician’s views that legalizing more drugs will slow the illegal drug trade and be a benefit to society as a whole.  So while The Onion developed this piece jokingly and with jovial intentions, they also were prudent enough to not make the entire issue a joke.  They had substance behind their humor.